You must give your opinion up to 15th December.
(If not, you´ll get a negative point)
It´s a pity for those who haven´t writen their comments.
You must give your opinion up to 15th December.
(If not, you´ll get a negative point)
You must give your opinion up to 15th December.
(If not, you´ll get a negative point)
Yes, because in the last year, the 15M movement had ideas very similar to anarquism, like popular assemblies. In my opinion, revolutions in streets such as the years before are a example of the spanish people want to change the system. But, I think, this wouldn't be successful.
ResponderEliminarI think it can't be possible, because we would need a lot of revolutions and the agreement of the people, and I think during this period of transitions some people could die, because these revolutions won't be peaceful. I think it wouldn't be successful for these reasons.
ResponderEliminarAt the moment it´s almost imposible. First Constitution should be changed. That implies two thirds of the votes in parliament, that is the two most important parties should agree.
ResponderEliminarSecond, I don´t think it would be successful because people must defend their ideas voting in elections, therefore anarchism includes taking power by force.
Of course it could be possible, in Spain there were a lot of protests and revolutions against the state with people that met together and defend their ideologies that want to change this system. But also I think this would't be successfull, but not imposible so I think that that people that want to defend their ideologies are going to continue their protests so, some day would be possible.
ResponderEliminarOf course it could be possible, in Spain there was a lof of protests and revolutions against the system. But also, of couse, it would't be successful but I hope that some day the ideologies would change and this revolutions will have been worth.
ResponderEliminarI think it could happen, but it would be chaotic, because society would be divided into small groups and probably they wouldn't coincide in their ideas. The good part is that the lower classes would have more importance, but their protests could turn out to be very violent, if they defend their interests and ideologies peacefully, it would be good, but it's very difficult. I think this would not be successful.
ResponderEliminarNo, because first we would have to destroy the monarchy and later the democracy although everything is possible and with a coup d'etat we could establish it. But in my opinion, it would be a step back because there would be no elections and political parties. I think that of doing something it would be establish popular assemblies but keeping democracy and what that entails. For this reasons I think that it would be no succesful
ResponderEliminarNo , because many people will not do what they have to do and they will being taking advantage of the other people . In my opinion , this wouldn´t be succesful.
ResponderEliminarNo, I think that political parties have to control the citizens and establish laws. One of the principles of anarchism is the direct action, but I think that if each person defends its own interests, everything would be a chaos. I think this wouldn't be successful.
ResponderEliminarno, because in theory is possible but in practice there will always be someone to rule and make the function header and function as a state. It would has to organize a set of meetings to decide all issues. I don't think it would succeed in the end because these meetings would be led by a few people who would like chiefs and would establish a system similar to the current system.
ResponderEliminarno, because although in theory it is possible in practice there will always be someone to rule and establish an organization like the state.It would have to be organized through meetings that lead whole society but at the end it would not succeed because there will be few who established as heads of the assemblies and create an organization similar to the state.
ResponderEliminarIt could be possible, but all would be a mess, because without a government, everyone would do what they want and all would be a chaos. I don´t think it would be successful.
ResponderEliminarI think that it´s possible to change our political status into anarquism, because people wanted to change this extreme situation and for this, they are going on strikes. If all the country rebelled against the governmet, there will be a possible change, but I think it won´t be successful in any way.
ResponderEliminarNo, because not everybody defend their interests peacefully, and it would be a disaster. I think not everyone thinks in the same way, people would not agree and there would be many revolutions. I don't think that it would be successful.
ResponderEliminar